ENGRAM · Quantis Quantum Control

Live Metrics Floquet cycle · 0.6s interval · Quantis USB-4M ε(t)

Entropy S

—

von Neumann · QRNG track

Syntropy Σ

—

1 − IPR(QRNG)

Fidelity

—

1 − |ds²|

MBL Gain

—

QRNG vs PRNG · target +38%

Entropy Source

—

IPR — Inverse Participation Ratio (QRNG track) IPR = 1/Σ|cᵢ|⁴ · normalised · lock < 0.3 · paper §2.1

—

0.0 Syntropy lock0.30.61.0 Entropy drift

Offline

⚠ ENGRAM·P correction dispatched

QRNG vs PRNG — IPR Comparison · Paper Table 2 Identical Floquet circuit · entropy source is the only variable

QRNG — Quantis USB-4M (4 Mbps)

PRNG — numpy baseline

Lock threshold 0.3

LLM Controllers · Ollama

DeepSeek-V3

Recovery · dispatched when IPR ≥ 0.3

STANDBY

Llama 3.3

Maintenance · active when IPR < 0.3

STANDBY

ENGRAM Memory Architecture · §2.4

EEpisodic

IPR history · phase noise · drive params

SSemantic

Zeta zeros · Quantis specs · IPR formula

PProcedural

Phase_Reset_v2 · NOT-NOT gate logic

Cycle Log No cycles recorded

Start the simulation to record cycles.

Session Summary

Cycles—

Avg IPR · QRNG—

Avg IPR · PRNG—

Avg MBL gain—

Lock time · QRNG—

Lock time · PRNG—

Corrections—

Run the simulation to generate an inference.

ENGRAM Query Interface ENGRAM context injected into every query · streaming

ENGRAM autonomous controller ready. Start the simulation, then ask either model about the current system state, QRNG vs PRNG comparison, or IPR trend.

QRNG vs PRNG IPR analysis Zeta comb Session summary Procedural memory NOT-NOT gate